DCED Systems MEL
DCED-aligned MEL systems were established and operated with external audit readiness built in.
Confidential by design. We protect partner privacy. We share methods, results, and learning without naming organisations. References are available on request.
DCED-aligned MEL systems were established and operated with external audit readiness built in.
Verified delivery in hard-to-reach areas and fed rapid findings into management meetings.
Rolling and retrospective baselines were designed where timing required flexibility.
Live decision dashboards were set up so managers acted on quality, coverage, equity, and performance signals.
Climate MRV calculators and protocols were integrated with operational monitoring.
Jobs frameworks captured direct, indirect, and induced employment with FTE and quality markers.
ESG diagnostics and reporting tools were rolled out with training for teams and boards.
Inclusion and poverty profiling were embedded using GESI, GALS, Washington Group tools, PPI, and MPI.
Remote monitoring routines were applied where access was constrained with consent-based voice.
Health systems were strengthened through preparation of routine information systems and decision dashboards.
For a bilateral donor in East Africa.
Rolling-baseline design and contribution analysis for a multi-country market systems programme, with TPM in hard-to-reach districts.
A multi-year MSD programme operating across two fragile contexts, with seasonality that made a single-shot baseline impossible and access challenges that limited routine verification.
Standard mid-term reviews had been completed, but the implementer and the funder disagreed on what the programme had changed. The methodology needed to handle seasonality, attribute contribution without overclaiming, and verify delivery where field teams could not travel.
We designed a rolling baseline that captured seasonality, applied contribution analysis to clarify MERSTAT's role in observed outcomes, agreed outcome and impact multipliers with the partner, and ran third-party monitoring in hard-to-reach locations.
A baseline that ignores seasonality is a baseline you cannot defend. Rolling baselines, paired with contribution analysis and TPM, give both the implementer and the funder a story they can sign.
For a multilateral climate fund.
Verification-ready climate MRV integrated with operational monitoring for an urban water utility.
A water utility piloting a low-carbon service-delivery model that the climate fund wanted to underwrite. Existing monitoring was operational, not climate-focused.
The utility could measure cubic metres and revenue. It could not measure tonnes of CO₂e avoided — and the climate fund would not sign off without that evidence.
We integrated a verification-ready MRV calculator with operational monitoring, mapped and automated activity data flows from field to dashboard, documented monitoring and verification protocols, and completed a value-for-money analysis.
Climate MRV that lives in a separate spreadsheet fails at verification. MRV integrated with the operational dashboard is the version that survives the buyer's review.
For a UN agency.
Routine information systems prepared for analysis and visualisation, with remote monitoring for facilities under access constraints.
A multi-country health portfolio with routine information systems that produced data but not decisions. Facility managers had reports no one acted on.
Field access was restricted in some districts, facility staff had limited analytics capacity, and the decision-makers needed quality and coverage signals in days, not months.
We prepared routine information systems for analysis and visualisation, used remote monitoring with risk-based sampling, and combined retrospective baselines with contribution analysis.
Routine data is only useful when it reaches a manager with the authority and the format to act. Remote monitoring, with consent and ethics, extends oversight without exhausting field teams.
For a regional development bank.
Jobs framework covering direct, indirect, and induced jobs, with team training and a mixed-methods review.
A regional aquaculture programme with a strong youth-employment mandate. Existing reporting counted placements; it did not count quality.
Donor guidance was tightening on jobs reporting — direct, indirect, and induced jobs, with FTE and quality markers — and the implementing team did not have the tools to deliver it.
We built a jobs framework covering direct, indirect, and induced jobs, trained teams on sampling, digital data capture, and Power BI use, and produced a mixed-methods review.
Jobs frameworks are not just about counting. With the right FTE and quality markers, they become the language that turns placements into policy.
DCED-compliant MEL systems with audit-ready documentation
Sentinel indicators and market actor networks
Baselines, midlines, endlines, impact assessments
Causal narratives linked to evidence
Risk-based sampling and consent-based voice capture
RHIS prepared for analysis and visualisation
Activity data systems that field teams can maintain
Operational ESG embedded in routines
Direct, indirect, and induced jobs with FTE and quality markers
DCED compliance built by design